Category Archives: FR Technical

5 Benefits of Westex® DH Performance FR Fabric

Unexpected arc flash and short-duration thermal exposure from fire hazards, also known as flash fire, are a daily reality for electric utility and oil and gas workers. To help keep workers safe on the job, industrial personnel require ongoing hazard protection in addition to specific attire for certain tasks. Everyday FR apparel, such as work shirts, pants and jeans, is an easy solution for these workers to be adequately protected in the event of an arc flash or short-duration thermal exposure from fire.

Read More

Four NFPA 2112 Updates that Could Impact Your FR Program

Back in the fall, NFPA 2112: Standard on Flame-Resistant Clothing for Protection of Industrial Personnel Against Short-Duration Thermal Exposures from Fire saw new changes implemented for the 2018 edition, which went into effect on September 6, 2017. The 2018 edition is a barometer for the safety industry as a whole – impacting suppliers and manufacturers down to end users. If you are investing in flash fire PPE in 2018, we outline four significant changes you should be aware of as you specify your garments and implement relevant protocols. Read More

Beyond Compliance: Specifying Reliable Flame Resistant Workwear

Know what you are truly buying: The AR/FR fabric in workwear is the single largest factor in determining the garment’s protection level, comfort, and overall value. Read More

Rethinking Risk Assessment

Rethinking Risk Assessment in Today’s Work Environments

By Matt Burtney
Content Marketing Associate, Superior Glove
and Scott Francis
Midwest Regional Market Manager, Westex by Milliken

Embracing a Safety Culture:

Since 1970, the workforce in the United States has doubled. In that same time, on-the-job fatalities have fallen by 68%.

What’s the driving force behind this change? Promoting a culture of safety in the workplace.

What’s a safety culture?

A safety culture is when an organization puts the health and well-being of its employees before company profits.

If that sounds impossible in a capitalist economy, keep in mind that according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average cost to an employer for a hand injury was $22,384 in 2012.

This means that preventing injuries is more financially responsible than cutting corners on safety prevention in the name of profits.

Some industries develop a safety culture to prevent injury, while others develop the attitude as a result of injuries.

How to adopt a safety culture:

Adopting a safety culture starts at the top. If upper management won’t embrace a safety culture, it’s nearly impossible to get buy-in from the employees who are most at risk.

Creating a safety culture starts with changing attitudes towards safety by seeing it as a positive. This can be done by reviewing your safety program, which will be addressed later in this article. Find where opportunities exist for improvement and where red flags lie for immediate change.

The benefits of a safety culture:

According to, “safety culture is one of the most significant drivers of an organization’s safety performance.” Once in place, this positive approach to safety will guide workers’ decisions on their actions.

The benefits of enforcing a high level of workplace safety are simple:

  1. It keeps the workforce healthy and able to work.
  2. A company’s public image reflects its safety record.

The Psychological Side of Safety:

Your brain sees 20,000 visual messages every 24 hours – from your drive to work, to the grocery store, to social media.

So how do you get your safety message across when you’re competing with 20,000 visual messages every day?

Understand visual brain power:

Your brain processes visuals 60,000 times faster than text, according to 3M. When providing safety training and manuals, avoid blocks of text and look for easy to read and understand information. Instead, look for materials that include numbered lists, bullet points, diagrams, and other helpful visuals.

Get back to basics:

We learn to process things visually years before we learn to read, so use that to your advantage. Think about your facility and how you present safety information. Use more colors and more visuals to make your message easier to understand.

Use blended learning:

Three days after receiving information, like at a safety training session, we retain:

    • 20 percent of what we heard
    • 40 percent of what we heard and saw
    • 70 percent of what we heard, saw, and was demonstrated to us

People learn in different ways. By incorporating different learning styles, you can engage the largest audience possible when presenting your safety message.

The competition for your employees’ attention is fierce. The bottom line is that your safety message has to be more appealing than what is on an employees’ phone.

New Lockout/Tagout Procedures:

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) releases its list of the top 10 citations issued that year. Lockout/tagout procedures consistently appear on that list, with 3,414 violations recorded in 2016.

Lockout/tagout refers to the actions taken to safeguard employees from unexpected energization or machinery startup.

When assessing risk, reviewing your company’s lockout/tagout and machine guarding procedures are crucial.

What is a lockout device?

A lockout device can be as simple as a combination or padlock, which keeps machinery in the “off” position. These locks are an easy and inexpensive way to prevent equipment from energizing.

What is a tagout device?

Tagout devices are prominent warning signs alerting workers when someone is servicing a machine and advising them not re-energize it. Tagout signs should only ever be used in conjunction with lockout device – not in place of them.

Updates to the standard:

The most noticeable update to the standard was the inclusion of the essential role that risk assessment plays in policies, programs, and procedures for controlling hazardous energy.

What is a risk assessment?

A risk assessment is used to figure out the measures needed to reduce the number of accidents in a workplace.

While there are no formal rules to carrying out a risk assessment, Rospa Safety Blog identifies the following five steps as a good place to start:

  1. Identify the hazards
  2. Decide who might be harmed and how
  3. Evaluate the risks and decide on control measures
  4. Record your findings and implement them
  5. Review your assessment and update as necessary

Learn more about changes to lockout/tagout standards:

To learn more about the revisions to ASSE/ANSI lockout/tagout standards, Todd Grover will be presenting Highlights from the Newly Released ASSE/ANSI Z244.1 Lockout/Tagout Standard on June 20 from 10:45 to 11:45am.

Reviewing a PPE Program:

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is your last course of action for preventing injuries. It is important to remember PPE is not meant to replace measures that prevent accidents.

For instance, a hard hat is worn to protect from unexpected falling items, like a pipe. It is not meant to mitigate the injuries from a pipe that you know is loose – instead, you need to secure the loose pipe.

Once those preventative measures are in place, you then need to make sure your PPE is going to protect your employees in the event of an accident.

Steps to reviewing your PPE program:

Step 1: Have a plan

Having a plan is crucial to avoiding mistakes like under-purchasing or supplying ineffective PPE. Involve your safety director, purchasing coordinator, and team leaders to discuss concerns, budgets and performance.

Step 2: Gather current PPE

Look at what is currently being used, track how long it has lasted with the number of washes before it is discarded, and collect user feedback. Are there pieces that employees love? Are there pieces that employees hate?

If your employees do not like a certain piece of PPE, that item is the first thing that needs to be swapped out. If employees hate it, they won’t wear it.

Step 3: Look for options

A reputable supplier will be able to provide options and, in many situations, will bring the PPE manufacturer with them to discuss these options. Superior Glove offers this as part of their glove review program. We work with your supplier to make sure concerns are addressed and PPE spends stay within budget.

Step 4: Train employees on uses and rules

Improperly used PPE has the potential to cause as much injury as not using PPE at all, so training is essential before implementation. Make sure to cover topics like proper usage, correct fitting and wear, and care and maintenance.

Step 5: Get feedback

You will only know if the new PPE is better if you talk with the people trialing it. When conducting PPE trials, provide feedback cards (click here to download yours) for workers to document their feelings about the new equipment.

Improving a PPE Program:

Following the five steps PPE review program, utilize your company’s feedback and the latest industry innovations to improve your PPE program and ultimately, protect your workers. In this section, we focus on essential elements for a PPE program – daily wear and task-based arc-rated/flame resistant (AR/FR) clothing.

Prioritize performance and comfort

You should not have to compromise comfort for high-performance protection. Daily wear FR apparel is a single layer of clothing, utilizing highly advanced fabrics, to make AR/FR clothing almost indistinguishable from regular street clothing. Consider conducting a wear trial of various garments to assess movement and breathability, so that you are confident workers will be able to work effectively and comfortably, and will want to wear the product.

Westex fabrics, including the Westex UltraSoft® line, are designed to prioritize both performance and comfort.

Specify PPE brand names for reliability

There are a variety of AR/FR fabric manufacturers in the marketplace; however, all fabrics are not equal when it comes to comfort, shrinkage, and most importantly, protection.

As you create AR/FR workwear programs, it’s important to specify trusted brand names. Brand name flame-resistant fabrics have a trusted reputation, because they have been proven to protect workers. Brand name reputations also help you know exactly what you are purchasing. There are significant differences in how similar fabrics with similar fiber constructions perform. Rely on proven brand name reputations to gauge the effectiveness of FR programs, and confirm their performance with third-party certifications. It is also important to ensure that the fabric can guarantee FR qualities for the life of the garment.

You can read more about the critical reasons to specify Westex fabrics here.

Task-based vs. daily wear programs

There are two types of AR/FR clothing programs: task-based and daily wear. Task-based requires workers to wear proper PPE clothing to perform a specific task. Daily wear programs require workers to wear AR/FR clothing at all times during work hours. Initially, companies can be attracted to task-based PPE due to lower upfront cost, as it usually only calls for one or two garments per employee. However, upon taking another look at long-term cost variables including potential liability, medical costs, and decreased productivity, many companies choose daily wear AR/FR clothing programs over task-based programs.

Risk level is also a key factor in choosing the correct PPE clothing program. The level of risk for task-based programs is higher because employees who are working around energized or thermal hazards are expected to recognize a hazard and put on the appropriate protective clothing garment. This human variable increases the risk and decreases productivity with workers changing in and out of garments.

Daily wear programs require a minimal level of training to ensure proper wear but are well worth the investment to protect your workers.

(Task Based vs. Daily Wear Webinar)

Feeling unsure about reviewing your safety program? Stop by Superior Glove (Booth 1125) and Westex by Milliken (Booth 1525) at ASSE Conference and Expo to talk to our experts!

About the authors

Matt Burtney is the Content Marketer for Superior Glove – a leading manufacturer of work gloves and protective sleeves. Visit booth #1125 at ASSE to see Matt’s safety talk “The Top 5 Things You Need to Know to be Safer at Work.” Visit to learn more.

Scott Francis has been involved with the safety industry since 1991, and has extensive experience with protective apparel fabrics and programs. He participates in numerous industry organizations, and addresses trade associations regarding hazard protection, electric arc and flash fire hazards, body burn injuries, the protective performance of FR clothing, and related topics. Visit to learn more.

Westex by Milliken & Haws Corporation ASSE Safety 2017

How ASSE Safety 2017 Innovations Enhance Employee Safety

By Scott Francis
Midwest Regional Market Manager, Westex by Milliken
and Samantha Hoch
Marketing Communications Strategist, Haws®

We believe when it comes to safety, you should not have to compromise. Leaders in the safety industry design innovative, yet functional, equipment to protect workers while on the job. From emergency response equipment to flame resistant (FR) fabrics, today’s safety programs incorporate leading technology to provide a multifaceted plan to combat job-related hazards.

Today, we partnered with Haws, a leading emergency response equipment manufacturer, to preview new safety innovations premiering at the upcoming ASSE Safety 2017 in Denver, June 19-21, 2017.
Read More

Westex by Milliken & Lewellyn at ASSE Safety 2017

How To Effectively Control Combustible Dust

By Jason Reason CIH, CSP, CHMM
Senior Vice President of Safety and Health Services, Lewellyn Technology, LLC
with Scott Francis
Midwest Regional Market Manager, Westex by Milliken

The issue of combustible dust and its associated hazards (fire, deflagration, explosion) has always existed in several industries in one form or another. Only recently has the topic of combustible dust become one of the main concerns and focal points in safety and health. We have partnered with Lewellyn Technology to explore combustible dust hazards and how to control them leading up to ASSE Safety 2017.
Read More


Historically, the flame resistant properties of flame resistant fabrics could be separated into two categories: Inherent and treated. Once upon a time, this was a relevant distinction. It meant the difference between FR properties that were durable, and those that were not. However, these terms ceased to provide information to safety managers looking to evaluate FR fabrics way back in 1987.

Read More


The success of your flame resistant (FR) clothing program depends heavily on the fabric used to construct the garments. Both arc rating and flash fire “2112” testing are done by fabric brand and weight; the fabric brand is also the key factor in durability of FR properties, initial and long term comfort, shrinkage control, wear life, and more.  For these reasons, it’s very important that you take an active role in specifying the fabric used to produce finished garments. Here are a few questions to consider when evaluating fabric manufacturers:

Read More

Comfort, heat stress and garment selection

There are many questions and even more misunderstandings around comfort and heat stress for people specifying or wearing arc rated and flame resistant protective apparel; thus, it is important to understand a few basics on the interrelationship, if any, to garment or fabric type and weight. Discomfort and heat stress are not used interchangeably. Comfort is an inherently subjective characteristic that cannot be effectively or predictably measured by lab tests or judged across a desk, and is considered a nuisance issue. However, heat illness is a specific and potentially medically consequential event; it is unrelated to comfort, and is a potentially major health issue.

Read More

The Difference Between Arc Rated (AR) and Flame Resistant (FR)

There’s a new acronym in the world of PPE, and it has been causing confusion, both among folks new to the subject as well as those long familiar with FR (Flame Resistant) clothing. The letters “AR” stand for Arc Rated, and made their debut in the recent revision of NFPA 70E; the short explanation of the difference is that ALL AR clothing is flame resistant (FR), but not all FR rated clothing has been Arc Rated.

Read More